RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems

[David Catchpole]

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Craig Carey wrote:
> 
> I doubt cubes have a place in voting theory. If the 3 candidate either win
>  or lose, then the cube has no interior, it is just 8 points. It hardly matters
>  if it is a 

Well, it's not a cube per se, but rather an octahedron formed by the
intersection of 

1<=x+y+z<=2

and

0<=x,y,z<=1

-------------------------------------------
Nothing is foolproof given a talented fool.