Messages by Thread
-
-
[EM] PBS Greeks and Democracy Show
DEMOREP1
-
RE: Dollar example
DEMOREP1
-
RE: Condorcet same as Approval with partial info?
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] "None of the Rest"
Donald E Davison
-
[EM] Dollar example
Bart Ingles
-
Re: the anti-middle strategy examples with Condorcet
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Correction
Bart Ingles
-
[EM] Condorcet same as Approval with partial info?
Bart Ingles
-
RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Not trying to take credit.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Compromise strategy?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] New Condorcet versions, & a classification for them
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Circular tie solutions should be obvious
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Re: Ratings as a standard
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Axioms P3, P2, Truncation Resistance, and 2 candidate solution
Craig Carey
-
Pairwise Vote Terminology (was Re: "Votes over" (Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as))
Norman Petry
-
Re: "Votes over" (Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as)
Norman Petry
-
[EM] Mathematical formulation for truncation resistance
Rob Lanphier
-
Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Clones in Circular Ties
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as votes-against (fwd)
Rob Lanphier
-
RE: Debian pairwise voting (fwd)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Debian pairwise voting (fwd)
Rob Lanphier
-
[EM] Pairwise voting in use: Debian Project
Rob Lanphier
-
[EM] Another look at Tideman
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Tideman and GMC
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] U.S. high court limits federal voting rights power
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Ratings as a standard
Bart Ingles
-
[EM] Labour must re-commit to UK vote reform - Lib Dems
DEMOREP1
-
Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail (slow)
Craig Carey
-
[EM] California Open Primary Draws US Supreme Court Scrutiny
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Alaska Internet Voting (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] California Internet Voting Task Force Report (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Proposed Revised U.S.A. Constitution, 18 Jan 2000
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] ERS Commission on Electronic Voting (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Yet Another PR method
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Criteria and the Smith Set
Rob Lanphier
-
[EM] Election Law Book
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Converting super-majorities to margins
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Super-majorities in ranked methods
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Britain will get PR referendum, Cook says
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Test message
Rob Lanphier
-
[EM] Final results of Russia Duma poll for party lists
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] U.S. and State Gerrymander Data
DEMOREP1
-
RE: Candidate List
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Candidate List
Donald E Davison
-
[EM] CIVI Title and Summary Released (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Low tech p.r. election method 27 Dec 1999
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Low tech p.r. election method.
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] TABLE-Russia final election results and seats
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Gerrymander map/cartoon
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] PhD Thesis on voting schemes (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] The Second Treatise of Government
DEMOREP1
-
Re: Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not be
Craig Carey
-
[EM] NZ Percent Seats- Percent Votes
DEMOREP1
-
RE: (P1) defined
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] P.R. Hearing text- P.R. Speech
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Introduction to "Distribution of power under stochastic social choice rules" Pattanaik and Peleg, Econometrica Vol 54 No 4 Resent-Message-Id: <"GfNao3.0.J03.N_mLu"@mx1>
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Some more comments on PR, STV, and MMP for EM
Donald E Davison
-
[EM] STV and MMP are not Too Complicated.
Donald E Davison
-
[EM] Lib Dems warn Blair to look at how Britain votes
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Geometric descriptions
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Final count puts NZ coalition govt as minority
DEMOREP1
-
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
DEMOREP1
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Craig Carey
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
[EM] (II) Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
Re: FPTP... Borda
Craig Carey
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Craig Carey
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Reply to M. Schulze
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Reply to M. Schulze
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Cloning: 2nd preference doing worse is implied by (P1)
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better
David Catchpole
-
Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better
David Catchpole
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]