Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods

[Adam Tarr]

2 more questions about Condorcet-PR:

- is there any sequential version of this? I can't figure one, since the placement of the cutoffs depends on the total number of candidates being elected.

- I will admit this is the first election method I've dealt with where I have trouble manipulating small examples. Here's a very small example that was gibing me trouble: say we are electing two candidates out of four. My ballot is: A(>B=C=D). The pairwise matrix will be 6x6 (with 6 empty slots). With respect to my ballot, every comparison is equivalent to one of the following:

AB vs. CD
(k1 + j2 = 1 + 1 = 2? k2 + j1 = 0 + .5 = .5?)

or

AB vs. BD
(k1 + j2 = .5 + 1 = 1.5? k2 + j1 = 0 + 1 = 1?)

or

AB vs. AC

(k1 + j2 = k2 + j1 = 1.5 + .5 = 2)

Do the summations I wrote make sense? The results (except the trivial last one) seem a bit odd. I was toying with this example to try and measure how equivalent your Condorcet-PR method is to PAV in situations where the voters vote in an approval-like fashion.


----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em