Warren Smith wrote:
>Yes to Chris Benham; I independently came up with a very similar IRV >FAVS-violation example >and posted it on >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RangeVoting/message/2716 >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RangeVoting/message/2708 > >To Scott Ritchie, yes, I just invented the name FAVS and IFAVS (incomplete >info version). > >Perhaps FAVA is better name than FAVS. > >N.Tideman told me, however, that he does not consider FAVS-satisfaction >necessarily to >be a good thing. In fact, he thinks it is probably a bad thing. > So what is that is supposed to be good about satisfying FAVS ? Chris Benham ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
