Hello,
--- En date de : Sam 31.10.09, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> a écrit :
> De: Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>
> Objet: Re: [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential
> round elimination is not
> À: "Juho" <juho4...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Cc: kathy.d...@gmail.com, "Election Methods"
> <election-methods@lists.electorama.com>
> Date: Samedi 31 Octobre 2009, 12h26
> On Oct 31, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Juho
> wrote:
>
> > (PR makes sense in general but I wouldn't deny people
> the right to achieve the political balance using two-party
> systems if they so want.)
>
> How would this decision be made? Majority rule?
It's not hard to imagine a referendum with that kind of effect. I
don't see how you can get away from majority rule; even if we elect
a body using PR-STV to vote on the party system, that's still majority
rule (or a super-majority rule with a possibility of no outcome), it's
just different people voting in the end.
Kevin Venzke
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
