Hallo, Dave Ketchum wrote (18 April 2010):
> Why IRV? Have we not buried that deep enough? > Why not Condorcet which does better with about > the same voting? > > Why TTR? Shouldn't that be avoided if trying > for a good method? TTR requires smart deciding > as to which candidates to vote on. > > Will not Condorcet attend to clones with minimum > pain? Voters can rank them together (with equal > or adjacent ranks). > > Does not Condorcet properly attend to "symmetric" > with a voted cycle? In my opinion, "Condorcet" refers to a criterion rather than to an election method. Markus Schulze ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
