I like the overall structure, but the syntax could certainly be edited for clarity. Shorter sentences with a few concrete examples will feel simpler, even if it ends up longer. I'll make an attempt later.
Also, I think that the two pages should be merged, with your page as the introductory section of mine. JQ 2011/7/12 Andy Jennings <electi...@jenningsstory.com> > I agree with Kevin that the existing SODA page on the wiki is _not_ for > novices. > > I created a simplified page: > http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Simple_Optionally-Delegated_Approval_(simplified) > > Feel free to edit, but let's add to it as little as possible, or even take > some away if we can. > > Andy > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Venzke <step...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> --- En date de : Ven 8.7.11, Toby Pereira <tdp2...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit : >> The thing about SODA is that it's harder to "get" than Approval Voting. >> I haven't exactly read through all the posts on it here thoroughly but >> I've looked at the page - http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/ >> Simple_Optionally-Delegated_Approval - and I do find myself >> thinking "What?" >> [end quote] >> >> >> Well hmm. I'm kind of looking at this article as a collection of things >> that have been said by SODA people. As a neutral intro to the method >> for people who don't know whether the inventors have any idea what they >> are talking about, it's kind of terrible. >> >> In particular that intro paragraph... I didn't want to go on. >> >> "I'm going to abandon the neutral voice and talk as myself." >> >> Ahaha. >> >> Maybe the article should be forked. Have one concise, neutral version >> (like neutral neutral), and then the exciting one. >> >> Kevin >> ---- >> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list >> info >> > > > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info > >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
