---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkk...@hotmail.com> To: <election-meth...@electorama.com> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:19:28 +0000 Subject: [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
David Wetzel said: s for center-squeezing, that's not really a problem in the US as a whole... Third parties are too small and scattered. [endquote] MO: Ok, so David is saying that IRV is adequate adequate only in a two-party system. dlw: David is saying, Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change [two-party dominated system in US] and the courage to change the things I can change [rallying support of others around American forms of PR + IRV] and the wisdom to tell the difference between a dysfunctional two-party system and one that would "work". dlw
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
