Messages by Thread
-
-
[EM] 3 or more choices-Condorcet
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Maybe margins is better than wv...but still not nearly good enough.
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Approval voting and incumbents
Andy Jennings
-
[EM] Typo. Two polls.
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Choosing leaders in a legislature
Andy Jennings
-
[EM] Jameson: Democrats and voting system reform
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Ken B.: Changing voting system law
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] IRV Revisited. Easy Implementation of Plurality's Optimal Strategy.
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Another e-mail accidentally sent to EM
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Part 1 Corrections
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Fwd: 3 or more choices - Condorcet
Juho Laatu
-
[EM] testing 1,2,3.... hellooooo?
robert bristow-johnson
-
[EM] How Progressives Might Optimally Vote in the 2012 Presidential Election, In Various Methods
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Two more alternative presidential debates - Sun Nov 4 and Mon Nov 5
Jan Kok
-
[EM] Article: Answers to some traditional Condorcet arguments
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] We should consider other claims, and not just try to justify our own positions. Only that is genuine discussion.
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Sandy
augustin
-
[EM] Kristofer: Reply re: ICT criterion failures, continued
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] 1037
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Kristofer: Reply re: ICT criterion-failures, continued
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
Re: [EM] Independence from clones, and Condorcet//FPP criterion failures
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
[EM] A Reformer's Lament
aGREATER.US
-
[EM] Independence from clones, and Condorcet//FPP criterion failures
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
[EM] Introduction
Jonathan Denn
-
[EM] Alternative presidential candidate debate Tuesday, Oct 23, 6PM PDT
Jan Kok
-
[EM] A few methods that pass, and a few methods that fail CD
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] The Chicken Dilemma Criterion (CD)
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] An omission in my EM posting about Symmetrical ICT
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] Facebook poll with ranked voting
Jeffrey O'Neill
-
Re: [EM] electowiki article edit won't post
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT can work as intended, and meet Later-No-Help.
Jameson Quinn
-
[EM] Voting systems for other societies, electorates and choices
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] The EM Peer Review Journal development web site is up!
augustin
-
[EM] IRC chat about journal NOW
Jameson Quinn
-
[EM] Another question for Strong Condorcet advocates
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Let's clear up some confusion
Juho Laatu
-
[EM] Approval is non-manipulable for utility maximizers
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] I don't oppose hosting of the "journal" by DC
Jameson Quinn
-
[EM] 3 or more choices - Condorcet
DNOW1
-
[EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Adrian Tawfik
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Adrian Tawfik
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Richard Fobes
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Richard Fobes
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Andy Jennings
-
[EM] Getting started... Re: Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
augustin
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
robert bristow-johnson
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
[EM] Single-winner method used for multiple-winner elections; Wikipedia's election-method mistake
Richard Fobes
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Fred Gohlke
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
augustin
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Jameson Quinn
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Adrian Tawfik
-
Re: [EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
augustin
-
[EM] Amateur peer-reviewed "journal" for voting methods, criteria, and compliances?
Adrian Tawfik
-
[EM] MJ for use on wikipedia?
Jameson Quinn
-
[EM] Juho: I agree to disagree
Michael Ossipoff
-
Re: [EM] Juho: Different answers to your questions. You're right...
Juho Laatu
-
[EM] SCOTUS -- WV redistrict case
DNOW1
-
[EM] SITC vs [what?]
Michael Ossipoff
-
[EM] 2012 Netherlands P.R. election results
DNOW1
-
[EM] A CMJ-like numeric tiebreaker equivalent to MJ
Jameson Quinn
-
[EM] Divided Majorities - Number Votes Matrix - Left Vote Shifts
DNOW1
-
[EM] Minority Rule Gerrymanders U.S.A. - a simple P.R. Method
DNOW1
-
[EM] OpenSTV 2.1.0 released and new OpaVote features
Jeffrey O'Neill