OK, I will totally eat this one if that's true, if there was no hostile intent. But it sincerely appears to me that there IS hostile intent, and passive aggressiveness.
* Benn doesn't seem to be able to distinguish * People like Benn apparently still don't get it. * Benn also does not seem to recognize If I am wrong, then I unreservedly apologize to all. But it's hard for me to see this as utterly benign, as opposed to sneakily hostile. Maybe I am totally off base here - maybe being impugned in the third person in front of oneself is completely socially acceptable. It just doesn't seem like a nice intent to me. -Benn Grant eFix Computer Consulting <mailto:b...@4efix.com> b...@4efix.com 603.283.6601 From: electionscie...@googlegroups.com [mailto:electionscie...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jameson Quinn Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 6:46 PM To: Benjamin Grant Cc: electionscie...@googlegroups.com; EM Subject: Re: [EM] [CES #8970] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benn, Warren did cross a line with you, and you were entirely justified in calling him on it. But on a list like this, with half a dozen people actively participating in each thread, it is really hard to decide whether to address people in the second or third person. I understand that after the incident with Warren you are naturally a little bit touchy, but I think that Stephen was arguing in good faith, and you should try address his arguments' logic and not their language. My humble opinion-ly y'rs, Jameson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Center for Election Science" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to electionscience+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:electionscience+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
