+1 On 9 Jul 2013 18:09, "Conscious User" <consciousu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Em Ter, 2013-07-09 às 18:42 +0200, Christian Dywan escreveu: > > A GNOME user will say exactly the same about Elementary. Ditching the > > shell, forking the window manager, discarding all apps, adding > Contractor… > > I am a GNOME user, and I can assure you that it's not the same thing. > > Elementary forks, adds, and removes, while ubuntu patches and modifies. > More importantly, Ubuntu sometimes patches and modifies without changing > APIs and namespaces, so app developers sometimes expect one thing and > have another. That's the main issue. > > If an app developer uses Mutter documentation to access Gala > and something goes wrong, that's his fault. > > If an app developer uses Shell documentation to access Pantheon > and something goes wrong, that's his fault. > > If an app developer has non-documented rendering differences > due to Ubuntu patches, despite doing exactly what the GTK > documentation tells him to, that's *not* his fault. > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
