> On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:03:20 +0100, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > OK to merge to master? It is now in <jankratochvil/pending>. > > > > Yes, that looks fine. > > Checked in: > f1ccc410d6bda15ed49fc5d0fef9f6f65acbfb63
Thanks. > off_t and loff_t should be always the same due to AC_SYS_LARGEFILE in use. > Therefore also unifying s/(off_t|loff_t)/loff_t/ as at least in public > elfutils > headers apps using elfutils-libs may not be using AC_SYS_LARGEFILE. Right. The only appearances of *off_t in the public API are in libelf.h, and those are already loff_t because of exactly this issue. But it would indeed be clearer to use loff_t uniformly in all the source even though off_t always means the same thing in the internal code because we compile it with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
