On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 10:05 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I did pick -U because it wasn't used by elfutils or binutils readelf.
> --unprocessed-values also starts with an 'u'. But might be a little too
> generic indeed. What it really does is not resolve any offset values in
> DWARF .debug sections to addresses, but just print the value
> unresolved/unprocessed. So how about -U, --unresolved-offsets. Or maybe
> -O, --offset-values? -O is also not used by either readelf or eu-readelf
> yet.
OK, nobody likes either of those? What about using -U, with the more
verbose long option --unresolved-address-offsets?
Output control:
-N, --numeric-addresses Do not find symbol names for addresses in DWARF
data
-U, --unresolved-address-offsets
Display just offsets instead of resolving values
to addresses in DWARF data
_______________________________________________
elfutils-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
