On 09/22/2013 02:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:49:49PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: >> But this also >> shows that the new dwarf_getfuncs slowed down about .5s either way, with >> no benefit. > > On irc Tom Tromey suggested to trust the CU language to win back most > speed for programs mainly written in C (like the kernel). The attached > patch does that. With this variant of the patch you get all correctness > benefits (imported/partial unit support and detection of nested functions > in C code, plus detection of defining subprograms inside other constructs > for other langauges), but with a slowdown of < 0.1s in this particular case.
Confirmed, I'm down to just about .1s added to the kernel queries. Looks good to me! Josh
