On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 14:49 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 09/22/2013 02:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On irc Tom Tromey suggested to trust the CU language to win back most > > speed for programs mainly written in C (like the kernel). The attached > > patch does that. With this variant of the patch you get all correctness > > benefits (imported/partial unit support and detection of nested functions > > in C code, plus detection of defining subprograms inside other constructs > > for other langauges), but with a slowdown of < 0.1s in this particular case. > > Confirmed, I'm down to just about .1s added to the kernel queries. > > Looks good to me!
Thanks for all your reviews, testing and even implementing an alternative implementation. I have pushed this variant to master now. Hopefully with your suggestions for some improvements in the DIE classifying we can get rid of the last remaining "slowdown". Cheers, Mark
