Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Mon, May 08, 2006: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:14:04AM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote: > > Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Sun, May 07, 2006: > > > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:55:57PM -0400, Seth Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > After a lot of time messing around--I am pathetic at this--I > > > > discovered that I had to specify the path to the program. It > > > > installed in a place not in my $PATH statement. Took a while to > > > > find it. It was installed at /usr/X11R6/bin/xclip. > > > > > > Then your PATH is in grave error -- as /usr/X11R6/bin should always > > > be in it. That's probably soemthing your distribution should fix. > > > > I remember reading somewhere that all X programs are migrating to > > /usr/bin in Debian (am running Ubuntu myself). > > That seems pointless, not to mention contradictory to the LSB (and FSH). > Has there been some illogical and radical shift to want to make this > happen? I'd find it odd that such a change would be distro-specific, > given /usr/X11R6/bin's ubiquitous.
The source is this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/04/msg00010.html -- Jonas Fonseca _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
