Yes, please go ahead. On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Felipe Stival <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have Map.pop/2,3, Keyword.pop/2,3, so I think that, for coherency, we > should also have default return support on Access.pop. > > This would require no additional callbacks, just a minor addition in the > Access.pop implementation. > > I can send a PR if you agree. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/dd8328f8-f53a-4c96-a831-66dc1438bc15n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/dd8328f8-f53a-4c96-a831-66dc1438bc15n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2BUhp9FuoOFbZJkzxE9ns-FEz5A%2BMY1TkfH-_NtMQFf5A%40mail.gmail.com.
