> What would need to change in the Elm architecture for it to match SAM?
I'm just someone interested in learning elm, so I cannot answer. Are the architects of elm, following these messages, who can? Evan Czaplicki? And is this interesting enough to contact Jean-Jacques Dubray, Evan? Op dinsdag 24 mei 2016 20:30:55 UTC+2 schreef Nick H: > > Peter's description is very close to how I manage states in my code. It > never occurred to me that it might have its own name; it just seemed the > most natural way to manage states within the Elm Architecture. > > The model is a union type. The action is a union type. The update function > is just a case statement, so actions that are nonsensical for the model > state can be easily ignored. > > As far as I can tell, Dubray's criticism of the Elm Architecture is > summarized in this quote: > > "That assertion is erroneous. You would be missing a couple of important > parts: > - the logic that decides which state you are in so you can properly > compute the view and enable the actions associated to the state > - the next action predicate" > > The first point of complaint is that both the update and view functions > need a case statement. > The second point of complaint is that ... I am not sure. It seems to me > that Elm's Effects are filling the role of Dubray's next action predicate > just fine. > > These seem like aesthetic differences, so I am sure there is some point > that I am missing. What would need to change in the Elm architecture for it > to match SAM? > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Peter Damoc <pda...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Aligning Elm with TLA+ will make it even more solid from a theoretical >> point of view. >> >> SAM sounds very intriguing. I'm wondering if SAM couldn't be implemented >> in terms of TEA using a tagged union as Model. >> >> something like this: >> https://gist.github.com/pdamoc/c96714479d9f531fbc7468d5670ef576 >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Houtzager <stefan.h...@gmail.com >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> I am interested in learning elm. I just read an article from >>> Jean-Jacques Dubray. He thinks an alignment with "SAM" would make elm >>> stronger: >>> https://www.infoq.com/articles/no-more-mvc-frameworks#anch133142. >>> Discussions: https://gitter.im/jdubray/sam. >>> What do you think? Might it be interesting to start a discussion >>> with Jean-Jacques Dubray? >>> >>> -- >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Stefan Houtzager >>> >>> Houtzager ICT consultancy & development >>> >>> www.linkedin.com/in/stefanhoutzager >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to elm-discuss...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elm-discuss...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
