Oh, didn't know that, thank you. But I agree that the critical thing we don't have is a simple hover. lol
2016-06-02 22:53 GMT+09:00 Peter Damoc <pda...@gmail.com>: > Sean's elm-style is the successor of the elm package inspired by that > presentation: > > http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/seanhess/elm-style/1.0.1/ > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Yosuke Torii <jinjor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm from the first group but on the way of experimenting inline style >> inspired by "CSS in JS" from React community :) >> >> >> 2016-06-02 21:18 GMT+09:00 Peter Damoc <pda...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I'm actually from the third group and I'm primed to be the most >>> dissatisfied. >>> I come from traditional GUI programming. ;) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Tim Stewart <finelinestu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I see your point Peter, I think it depends on where you're coming from. >>>> I get the impression Elm draws interest from two groups - those with a >>>> front-end web-dev background interested in an alternative to the prevailing >>>> view that "the answer to the problems in JavaScript is ... more JavaScript" >>>> (ES6/ES7/JSX...) and those from a functional programming background >>>> interested in how functional principals are being applied in a new language >>>> and environment. Probably the former are glad to be able to leverage >>>> existing assets (stylesheets) and skills on the styling front while the >>>> latter are keen to explore how things can be done better using functional >>>> principles. It's great to have both options. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 7:35:52 PM UTC+10, Peter Damoc wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I understand how using Elm for CSS might look like a case of "I've got >>>>> a hammer..." and the external CSS has its merits, especially when it comes >>>>> to transitioning from a traditional HTML+CSS+JS to Elm. >>>>> >>>>> CSS in Elm comes with its own set of advantages and, in the long run, >>>>> I think it might be a way better option. >>>>> It can use types to make sure that changes to IDs or Classes are >>>>> consistent throughout. Named values can make for an additional line of >>>>> defense against typos. >>>>> It has way better composition and much more flexibility due tot the >>>>> fact that one can create style on the fly based on information from the >>>>> environment (e.g. device size and/or DPI). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Tim Stewart <finelin...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ondrej's approach makes sense to me too. The advantages Elm brings to >>>>>> the table - ensuring program validity, eliminating runtime errors and >>>>>> issues related to mutable state etc. - just aren't really problems in >>>>>> CSS. >>>>>> The shortcomings that CSS does have are mainly addressed by LESS, it's >>>>>> quick and easy to iterate by copying styling experiments in the browser >>>>>> directly back to source, and I'm guessing it's a smoother workflow when >>>>>> collaborating with designers, embedding into existing sites etc. Using >>>>>> Elm >>>>>> for CSS seems to me a bit like a case of "I've got a hammer...". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 4:48:35 AM UTC+10, Ondřej Žára wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I used Elm.embed, static <link rel="stylesheet"> in my parent >>>>>>> document and (obviously) an external stylesheet, preferrably using a >>>>>>> Less >>>>>>> preprocessor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> O. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 11:26:37 AM UTC+2, Peter Damoc wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you handle styling in your Elm programs? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you use one of the following libraries? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> rtfeldman/elm-css >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> seanhess/elm-style >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> massung/elm-css >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or do you do something completely different (manual style inlining, >>>>>>>> classes and external css) ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I tried using Sean's library but I quickly ran into >>>>>>>> pseudo-selectors trouble wanting to implement a simple hover effect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Somehow, keeping a set of hover states for some simple nav-link >>>>>>>> seams such an overkill. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you handle such scenarios? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >>>>>>>> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to elm-discuss...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >>>>> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >>> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/AC6cqdeKDOs/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > There is NO FATE, we are the creators. > blog: http://damoc.ro/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/AC6cqdeKDOs/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
