Yeah elm-css is a library. I think a library is the way to go here, not a language addition. :)
To me it's not a question of "could CSS UX theoretically be better." I'm sure it could! The question is whether those benefits would justify the innate complexity increase of adding anything whatsoever to the language. I don't think they would. It's more important to me to keep the language simpler than to add CSS-specific features of any kind. :) On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, 9:45 AM suttlecommakevin <suttlecommake...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Richard, > > Could you elaborate on this statement? I'm having trouble understanding > how the Elm compiler, > known for it's awesome UX and errors, wouldn't help CSS. > > You even demoed it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R121YzswY_4 > > * > I can't think of a time its existence would have saved me a noticeable > amount of debugging time.* > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/vvJGw1u7NVQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
