On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Ambrose Laing <akla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So the question is -- if you treat a TEA program as just a piece of data, > a four-piece record which does nothing (until you run it with > Html.program), can you define any standard operations which can take two > TEA programs and be guaranteed to give you another TEA program? If there > were such an operation that operation would be closed. In the mathematical > sense. I think what Peter D. was arguing for. > Yes, that is the point. Right now, main accepts Html, if the output of `Platform.program` would be `Html`, then this would constitute a component that could be mixed with other components and could also be used as the value for `main`. programWithFlags could become just a regular function that would mimic the API of a regular component (config -> Html msg) programWithFlags : Flags -> Html msg Maybe Html would not be the best name, maybe UI would be better. The idea being that one would have a way to talk about this things just as pleasantly as they can talk about html components. -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
