First of, I would like to say that for me personally, this proposal doesn't matter. This proposal is written because I believe people with little to no Elm experience will understand the construct better.
The proposal, as the title of the post suggests, is to rename the "case..of" expression to "match..with". The reason being that I believe the words better matches what the construct does. As a non-native English speaker, case..of doesn't immediately make sense. However, match..with makes perfect sense. Match..with is what the same construct is called in F#, so it has that going for it. Case..of to match..with renaming could be handled by elm-format. As said, to me personally and, I believe, other seasoned elm devs, this won't matter that much. The question therefore becomes, how big of a difference will it make to new and future elm developers? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
