Fixing the docs could of course be done, and you're right, it's not something that's hard to understand. However, the question you should be asking is "is there any reason why range isn't a function to begin with?"
søndag 13. november 2016 16.58.32 UTC+1 skrev أحمد حبنكة følgende: > > > > بتاريخ الأحد، 13 نوفمبر، 2016 1:53:05 ص UTC+2، كتب أحمد حبنكة: >> >> I was reading the elm-dev list and I knew that elm 0.18 removed the range >> syntax, so code like this : >> [2..3] >> won't work anymore. >> >> I want to know what are the foundations behind this decision ? >> hmmm if it is "can't find it in the documentation" then fix the >> documentation, when the documentation is unfixable for this feature I think >> it may be better to remove it, was this the case ? >> > > The syntax of ranges is not specific to haskell, ruby and some other > languages implement it. > > Now for the fact that most new coders ask "what's this" or "how do I make > a range" maybe the problem lies in the docs not in the feature itself. > > still if it is confusing for most beginners then I agree it's probably > better to remove it although I find hard to believe that this feature is > hard to understand !! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
