Yup. It is just not used often enough to warrant special syntax. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Witold Szczerba <witoldsz....@gmail.com> wrote: > I think List.range is just fine. No need for special syntax and strange > function names like ".." (hard to browse, find online, etc.). > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:29 PM, أحمد حبنكة <ahmad13932...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> What do you think about my suggestion in previous reply ? replacing >> List.range with List.(..) operator ? >> >> >> بتاريخ الاثنين، 14 نوفمبر، 2016 2:43:49 ص UTC+2، كتب Max Goldstein: >>> >>> Sometimes it's useful to pass arguments to List.range and have it be >>> empty when a > b. >>> >>> Perhaps there should be List.rangeWithStep 5 1 -1 to solve your problem. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/z8t8u2f3iWk/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
