On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, 'Rupert Smith' via Elm Discuss < elm-discuss@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> What about the issue of people forking and re-publishing packages (and > ignoring the tests), because they are too impatient/anti-social to go about > things in more civilized manner? Do there need to be stricter controls for > getting stuff into the repo? Do we need or can we manage some kind of > cummunity oversight? Or is this unnecessary at this stage and its not > really such an issue? > > There is a goldilocks space between the creative stifling tyranny of too many restrictions and the chaos of no restrictions. There are already about 300 packages and we could benefit from - a little bit of organization (tags/categories) that could facilitate discovery and - a little bit of community validation to sift the very useful stuff from one-off experiments or angry forks. -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
