Hi,

Consider this:
let
  x = 1
in
  case something of
    x -> (...)
    _ -> (...)

The compiler will complain that "The following pattern is redundant", 
pointing to the wildcard. I assume that Elm ignores the fact that "x" is 
already bound, re-binds it in the first case match and that indeed makes 
the wildcard redundant. I know how I would do this in Elixir: I'd put "^" 
before "x" to explicitly say not to re-bind the x variable. Is there 
something like this in Elm?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to