On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:16 PM, GordonBGood <gordonbg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if this method works, the interim method means I have to produce >> JavaScript code which I understood that the purpose of Elm was to avoid. >> If one still has to write large parts of the code in JavaScript for this >> particular application, one then starts to ask why not use TypeScript >> directly (c#'ish syntax) or Kotlin with the JavaScript back end (more >> concise, can be very functional in use, quite a bit more advanced stage of >> development than Elm). For me, these are the implied questions this thread >> raises. >> > elm certainly hasn't hit the "all things for all people" stage yet, but if you do want to use an elm-like language with easier js interop I'd recommend F# rather than typescript or kotlin. check out this blog post: http://lucasmreis.github.io/blog/from-elm-to-fable/ martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
