On Thursday, 29 December 2016 09:47:13 UTC+7, Martin DeMello wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 6:25 PM, GordonBGood <gordo...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: >> >> >> Related to speed, it seems to me that the working Fable (F#) code linked >> from your link above is more responsive than the working Elm code from >> another link on that page, both for the same sample application; am I >> imagining things or do you see that too? >> > > yes, but it seems to be due to a slower load time from the backend rather > than any perceptible frontend differences. > > martin >
Do you know anything about PureScript as compared to Fable and Elm (according to the article it sits somewhere between as far as safety goes)? It seems that it has an extensive Haskell-like syntax and philosophy, but that may be overly complex for the types of people who would rather choose Elm. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
