On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 4:14:15 PM UTC, Rupert Smith wrote: > > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 4:10:06 PM UTC, Rupert Smith wrote: >> >> Then I could represent the data models as HAL or JSON-LD >> > > Or JSON-API, there are way too many emerging standards in this area... >
Actually, I want to try and keep the data representation in Elm and in the meta-model that codegen sources from abstract enough that it does not contain details of the specific wire format being used, or is particular to any single API description meta-language. Enough details that it can be mapped down to anything reasonable. If I manage that then I can always move to different formats as things evolve, or use Protocol Buffers to be more efficient, and so on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
