Simon Wright <[email protected]> writes: > On 9 Jun 2015, at 16:06, Simon Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually, as I noted, it was better to use Interface (“foo.c”), >> rather than Library_Interface, which requires you to nominate at >> least one Ada unit (when, in this case, none are actually exported). > > When I say “it was better” it turns out that (at any rate on the Mac, > probably everywhere) what I meant was “I would have expected it would > have been better”: turns out I was completely wrong, > > DO NOT DO THIS! USE LIBRARY_INTERFACE!! > > It looks as though it doesn’t elaborate properly, so I get a SEGV as soon as > it enters Parse. > > Hope the only time I wasted was my own ...
No worries, I had not gotten there yet. I did just push the scratch/dynamic-modules-2 branch on savanah, with my latest emacs code, so you could try pulling that. -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Emacs-ada-mode mailing list [email protected] http://host114.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/emacs-ada-mode_stephe-leake.org
