Kevin Rodgers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan Monnier wrote: >> It seems the problem is due to `back-to-indentation' which skips >> chars with a "whitespace" syntax and NBSP does have whitespace >> syntax. Maybe NBSP shouldn't have whitespace syntax. > > Whaaa? What syntax should it have instead?
Word constituent or symbol? Whitespace is, with regard to filling, interchangeable, and NBSP certainly does not fit that category. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
