Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My two big questions are: 1) Is anyone against this, and why?
My only concern is having more people affected by broken code. I don't know how Emacs developers works because I don't track their daily work, so maybe this isn't a relevant issue... Sometimes in the past, a MH-E developer would _try_ something, possibly a new way of handling something. He would check the new code into CVS and it might break the codebase a little while it was being finalized, but it was checked in so other developers could try it out and give feedback. I wouldn't feel comfortable doing this anymore knowing that I'm affecting Emacs for a far greater number of users. I prefer that we check in released version of MH-E that are known to work. -- Peter S. Galbraith, MH-E developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E 6623'rd GNU/Linux user at the Counter - http://counter.li.org/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
