> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:04:58 +0200 > From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Try this patch, please. It doesn't modify `set-variable' but > `user-variable-p', so it returns t for non-obsolete aliases of user > variables.
This patch produces the following text: Determined by whether the first character of the documentation for the variable is `*', the variable is customizable (has a non-nil value of `standard-value' or of `custom-autoload' on its property list), or it is a non-obsolete alias for another user variable. Does anyone else think that this sentence is so confusing in its structure as to be almost unparsable? (The old sentence was even less clear.) I think this sentence sorely needs rephrasing. For starters, it should not use passive tense. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
