I CC the list. On 2007-03-22, Eddward DeVilla said:
> On 3/22/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said: >> >> > Fixed, thanks. > >> > >> > - Carsten >> >> I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69: >> >> - [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j >> |<--- cursor moved here >> >> I think the following is more elegant: >> - [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j >> |<--- cursor moved here >> >> What do people think? > > I tend to use the top behavior, but I do kind of the look of the second one. > How would > you handle subcheck boxes? > > - [ ] list 1 > - [ ] list 1.1 > > or > > - [ ] list 1 > - [ ] list 1.1 > > Now that I think of it, this could be a little hairy for me. Right now the > behavior is > uniform. Always a 2 char indent (but I could live with a uniform 4 or 6 > char). But > sometimes I do the following > > - [/] list 1 > - [ ] list 1.1 > > The size of the [/] token can vary. I think I'd still like it to be treated > like a box > in this case. I guess I'd like it to indent the number of character as a > checkbox > line. > > Also, how would you handle numbered lists where the indent would also change > for lists > with 10 or more items. > > 1) [ ] foo1 > bar1 > 2) [ ] foo2 > bar2 > ... > 10) [ ] foo10 > bar10 > > Sorry for some many questions. I'm not against it. I think I've convinced > myself I'd > I'd like a deeper indent for readability. My just not sure what the right > thing is in > all cases. > > Edd I didn't think of that many cases. But the questions are all good for triggering a better solution. Thanks. -- Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
