emacs-orgmode  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright chris
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright chris
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright chris
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Russell Adams
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Bastien Guerry
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright chris
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Bastien Guerry
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright David Masterson
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Jean Louis
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright David Masterson
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Dominik Schrempf
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright Bastien
• Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references MT
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references MT
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references MT
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references MT
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: A rewrite of Org Babel detangling to support Noweb references MT
• Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Laurence von Bottorff
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Jim Porter
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Jim Porter
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Laurence von Bottorff
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? tomas
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Christian Moe
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Jim Porter
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Jean Louis
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Björn Kettunen
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Jean Louis
  • Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Thomas S. Dye
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] mbork
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Detlef Steuer
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Stefan Nobis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Björn Kettunen
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] tomas
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] tomas
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] tomas
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] tomas
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Christopher Dimech
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] tomas
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Christopher Dimech
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Christopher Dimech
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Christopher Dimech
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Richard Stallman
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Richard Stallman
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] Jean Louis
  • Re: Literate LLM programming? [Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates?] David Masterson
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Björn Kettunen
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Björn Kettunen
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Richard Stallman
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? José Manuel García-Patos
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? tomas
  • Re: Is org-mode accepting AI-assisted babel ob- code updates? Richard Stallman
• Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Marvin Gülker
  • Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Christian Moe
  • Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Christian Moe
  • Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Marvin Gülker
  • Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Christian Moe
  • Re: Gettign a list of citation keys in an org document Marvin Gülker
• Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright (was: [PATCH] ob: typed custom vars for org-babel-default-header-args (2 patches attached)) chris
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright (was: [PATCH] ob: typed custom vars for org-babel-default-header-args (2 patches attached)) Russell Adams
  • Re: [RFC] Pros and cons of using LLM for patches beyond simple copyright (was: [PATCH] ob: typed custom vars for org-babel-default-header-args (2 patches attached)) tomas
• [PATCH] org-babel-where-is-src-block-result: Recognizing empty results with captions (was Re: [Feature request] Caption/name propagation from source blocks to results) Nathaniel Nicandro
  • Re: [PATCH] org-babel-where-is-src-block-result: Recognizing empty results with captions (was Re: [Feature request] Caption/name propagation from source blocks to results) Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-babel-where-is-src-block-result: Recognizing empty results with captions Peter Tittmann
• Re: [Feature request] Caption/name propagation from source blocks to results Peter Tittmann
• Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ignacio Casso
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ignacio Casso
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ignacio Casso
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ignacio Casso
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ignacio Casso
  • Re: [BUG] [BUG] org-babel's cache doesn't work when block is evaluate indirectly [9.7.39 (release_9.7.39-1-gdf84ca @ /home/ignacio/repos/built-from-source/org-mode/lisp/)] Ihor Radchenko
• Re: Org 9.8: Warning (emacs): Org version mismatch David Talmage
• [BUG] wtf [9.7.11 (release_9.7.11 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.1/lisp/org/)] Ken Restivo
  • Re: [BUG] wtf [9.7.11 (release_9.7.11 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.1/lisp/org/)] Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [BUG] wtf [9.7.11 (release_9.7.11 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.1/lisp/org/)] Ihor Radchenko
• Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Björn Kettunen
  • Re: [PATCH] org-clock: clock-report be able to also take directories Ihor Radchenko
• Re: [FR] org-babel-n-tangle Ihor Radchenko
  • Fwd: [FR] org-babel-n-tangle Lei Zhe
  • Re: Fwd: [FR] org-babel-n-tangle Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [FR] org-babel-n-tangle Ihor Radchenko
• Re: [PATCH]: Add missing safe declaration Ihor Radchenko
  • Re: [PATCH]: Add missing safe declaration Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
  • Re: [PATCH]: Add missing safe declaration Ihor Radchenko
• Re: [WORG] Feedback about WORG index page on Hacker News Christian Moe
  • Re: [WORG] Feedback about WORG index page on Hacker News Ihor Radchenko

• Later messages