Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> writes: > Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > >>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who >>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to >>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think >>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor. >>> >>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome. >> >> I agree. We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different >> from latex-proper classes. This seems to cause a lot of confusion. >> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future. >> >> It’s a "relaxed" mode. I’m not sure what a good term for this is. > > Trial mode?
I think I will go with the straight to the point `org-export-barf-on-invalid-link' variable. However, not sure about the OPTIONS item. #+OPTIONS: ???:t Regards,
