Hi, Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes:
> I don't know which OS you are using, but just checking on > [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/1.15.1]] and > [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/tag/1.15.1.1]]: > > Windows: 19.7 MB > Mac : 27.9 MB > Deb : 20.2 MB > > The 1600MB must be including LaTeX? Nope, but something like 100 haskell libraries and ghc. I guess it’s not build in a static way? It’s much smaller on Debian, approx. 25Mb. (I should switch to Fedora full-time). > In General, I like the idea of using the Pandoc approach, as Pandoc > provides a very useful framework for all kinds of conversions (and I > don't like java...) Your first argument refers to a side effect (to us), and it is irrelevant IMO. Java run easily everywhere, easily, and if you use mathml for some of your documents, you’re likely already using a jar file with Org. That being said, it suggest that Pandoc /can/ be packed in a sensible way, which is good. Rasmus -- A page of history is worth a volume of logic