Rasmus <[email protected]> writes:
> Matt Lundin <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Perhaps someone with more experience of pandoc could assess how well it
>> toggles between CSL and biblatex, especially for more complicated styles
>> (e.g., Chicago).
>
> Can you point out an example of the expected format? Bibtex.el does
> pretty well and perhaps it’s trivial to transform an arbitrary bibtex key
> into the json format on the Emacs side.
Looking at,
https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/blob/master/csl-data.json
the main difficulty seems to be the author field, which is more "complex",
or perhaps just more sane, in the JSON equivalent. It may be possible to
use bibtex-autokey-demangle-name to approximate a translation from bibtex
to JSON.
There are clearly other complex fields like "accessed", but I guess it
would rarely show up in an bib(la)tex entry. But I have nothing to back
this claim up with.
Rasmus
--
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
