Hi,
Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes:
If the \centering would also be used for threeparttable or any
environment, there would be no conflict at all (I think). I do
not really understand why why the center environment is used
in the first place: it apparently causes conflicts with
several environments, but in effect seems to be no different
from the center environment.
[ I assume you meant “no different from \centering” ]
This is because in your example the table is exported as
non-floating. \centering only works as intended inside a Latex
group, which non-floating tables are not (necessarily) contained
in.
Perhaps we should use “{\centering” and “}” to center
non-floating tables – I’m not enough of a latex guru to know the
pros and cons. Do you have a reference that documents how the
environment version causes problems, or are you speaking from
experience?
I'd not like that. As I recall vertical spacing is often off when
you do this.
threeparttable seems ill-suited for Org IMO. The syntax is just
too specialized. E.g. tablenotes block also does not support
itemize so you have to insert @@latex:\item @@.
Perhaps one of the alternative packages mentioned here¹ could be
used.
bidiftnxtra² might also be interesting (I haven’t tested). From
the manual:
In standard LaTeX you can not use footnotes inside \chapter,
\part, \section, \subsection, \subsection and any other
section-like commands, \caption and tabular environment. bidi
package provides bidiftnxtra package that solves the issue of
footnote in standard LaTeX.
Rasmus
Footnotes: ¹
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/footnotes-in-tables ²
http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/software/tex/macros/xetex/latex/bidi/bidi.pdf
--
Warning: Everything saved will be lost