Hello, Yasushi SHOJI <yasushi.sh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> > wrote: >> >> Yasushi SHOJI <ya...@atmark-techno.com> writes: >> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ---- >> > * DONE org >> > DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39] >> > >> > SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w> >> > >> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ---- >> >> A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>. >> >> [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense... > > thanks for your comment. > chainging the inactive timestamp to active doesn't seem > to change the behavior. > > even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse > to show a closed entry, isn't it? I cannot reproduce your problem? Could you try with -Q (and a minimal Org configuration)? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
