>>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
SM> I have no opinion on that part, but if a part of Hydra would be useful for SM> other packages, then it'd be good to split it out: for me "Hydra" means SM> "define a Hydra via defhydra or something like that", so if you tell me to SM> use Hydra to "show the available valid key bindings", I wouldn't know SM> where to start. Plus, there are other, less intrusive way to achieve "show the available valid key bindings", such as the which-key package. I think one area where Hydras come into their own is that once you have the Hydra active, it stays active, allowing you to chain together many single- letter commands. For example, you could have a hydra for "large-scale syntactic structures", where repeated uses of n/p are mapped to what C-c C-n and C-c C-p usually do in modes like cc-mode. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
