Hello, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes:
> I would think that's so because canonically Org mode using [fn:1] style. It > looks like you are manually typing the footnote refs and definitions. > > Try using C-c C-x f binding.. you will see that Org inserts the footnotes > in the documented style. > > I would say that the "fn"-style footnotes remove any kind of > ambiguity.. Moreover, [1]-like footnotes have been removed in 9.0. It's a bug if Org thinks [1] is a footnote. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
