Hello, ST <smn...@gmail.com> writes:
> (a) May I propose the [^1] as an alternative footnotes syntax as a new > feature? I sympathize with your concern, and [^1] may not have been a bad choice when footnotes were introduced, but that ship has sailed long ago. There is enough footnote syntax in Org nowadays. I'd rather keep it that way. > (b) How can I define such syntax by my own as a footnote? You may have to tweak some libraries, e.g., org-footnote.el and org-element.el, but you're on your own here. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
