Ken Mankoff <mank...@gmail.com> writes: > On 2018-12-08 at 09:47 -0800, Leo Gaspard <orgm...@leo.gaspard.io> wrote: >> However, I think it may be a good idea to allow eg. this kind of >> timestamps: >> <2018-02-04 Tue evening> That would be handled as though it >> was eg. <2018-02-04 Tue 18:00-22:00> (which would be configurable), so >> that it would be both semantically correct (the time is still fuzzy) >> and correctly displayed (eg. on an agenda) >> [...] >> What do you think about this idea? Is there a better way to do what >> I'm trying to do with current tools? > > > I think this would be a neat feature. But as a first pass which can work > immediately, what about using one of the multiple text expansion packages > that are Org-agnostic to achieve this: Yasnippets or abbrev mode, for example? > > This doesn't maintain the "semantics (time still fuzzy)", but does let you > define and enter time ranges in a simpler way.
Hmm… I guess some abbreviation or command could add the fuzzy time and add a comment to indicate that the time is fuzzy should work as a temporary workaround indeed, thank you for the idea :)
