hello, On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 3:16 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello, > > cesar mena <cesar.m...@gmail.com> writes: > > > i'm ok going with the verbatim syntax - rescheduled lines will now look > > like (w/o the double quotes?): > > > > - Rescheduled from =[2019-02-05 Tue .1m]= on [2018-09-29 Sat 18:50] > > Thinking about it, another possibility is to add a variable, e.g., > `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps', letting the user choose what to do > with inactive time stamps. I think it would default to nil. > > This would be a more conservative solution; however, this would > contradict releases notes for Org 9.2. > > WDYT? > > this works of course and it doesn't affect current workflows while allowing for inactive repeating timestamps. the caveat would be that in the case of repeating timestamps, setting both `org-log-into-drawer' and `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps' to a true value will overwrite "Rescheduling" entries from the :LOGBOOK:. in some limited sense the two are incompatible (which would require the verbatim syntax). with that understanding, and the fact that repeating inactive timestamps is a new "feature" my vote is for `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps'. this leaves room down the road, should the need arise, for verbatim syntax in log entries. regards, -cm
