hello,

Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> cesar mena <cesar.m...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>> However, we still need to move forward. So, I suggest to revert the
>>> change about inactive timestamps. Inactive timestamps cannot be
>>> repeated. This is less disruptive than the current situation. 
>>
>> yes, agreed.
>
> Done in maint.

looks good here. 

thanks nicolas.

best,
-cesar

Reply via email to