On Fri 06 Dec 2019, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Andy Moreton <andrewjmore...@gmail.com> writes: > >> This is still a regression. >> >> The old behaviour allowed display of fixed width columns, even if that >> is wider than the content of cells in that column. This is useful for >> display of several related tables with aligned column dividers. >> >> How do I get the old behaviour back, rather than the new breakage ? > > I will try to ignore the sarcasm, or whatever you may call it, from your > answer.
No sarcasm intended, merely a re-statement that this change is a regression of user visible behaviour. > AFAICT, you still can have cells wider than their contents, e.g., try > `C-c TAB` on the table below. > > | <30> | > | foo | That still does not match the old behaviour though, as the table still shows the `org-table-shrunk-column-indicator' overlay which is undesireable. Dynamic shrink/expand is a fine feature to add, but why was it done in a way that broke the documented existing behaviour ? AndyM