Hello, Andy Moreton <andrewjmore...@gmail.com> writes:
> That still does not match the old behaviour though, as the table still > shows the `org-table-shrunk-column-indicator' overlay which is > undesireable. Why is it undesirable? > Dynamic shrink/expand is a fine feature to add, but why was it done in a > way that broke the documented existing behaviour ? I think the current state is better. However, I initially explained the motivation behind this change (see links in this thread). Feel free to suggest, and possibly implement, if users agree, a better way. Or, please point where the documented behaviour does not match the current state. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
