> Oops, you are right. I fixed this. It should be way faster. I can > navigate in your example file without much trouble. > > Please let me know how it goes.
I tested with master + my personal config + native compilation of org, Emacs native-comp branch, commit c984a53b4e198e31d11d7bc493dc9a686c77edae. Did not see much improvement. Vertical motion in the folded buffer is still quite slow. > The last commits have nothing to do with unfolding. Apparently I misunderstood the purpose of: 1027e0256 "Implement `org-cycle-hide-property-drawers'" Best, Ihor Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Hello, > > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Just tested the master branch. >> Three observations on large org file: >> >> 1. Next/previous line on folder buffer is still terribly slow > > Oops, you are right. I fixed this. It should be way faster. I can > navigate in your example file without much trouble. > > Please let me know how it goes. > >> 2. Unfolding speed does not seem to be affected by the last commits - it >> is still much slower than text property version. There might be some >> improvement if I run Emacs for longer time though (Emacs generally >> becomes slower over time). > > The last commits have nothing to do with unfolding. > > I'm not pretending that overlays are faster than text properties, > either. > > With the current implementation property drawers add no overhead : last > commits reduce drastically the number of overlays active in a buffer at > a given time. > >> 3. <TAB> <TAB> on a headline with several levels of subheadings moves >> the cursor to the end of subtree, which did not happen in the past. > > Indeed. I fixed that, too. Thank you! > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou -- Ihor Radchenko, PhD, Center for Advancing Materials Performance from the Nanoscale (CAMP-nano) State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China Email: yanta...@gmail.com, ihor_radche...@alumni.sutd.edu.sg
