TEC <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > I see. Would there be someone well suited to check that everything is > accurate? I wouldn't feel confident auditing the whole document by > myself.
Well, "we" of course includes Nicolas and other core contributors, but anyone is welcome. This should not be done by a single person. > Mmm. My thoughts on having lots on Worg haven't changed, I was just > thinking it might seem more 'official' / better if the page were > nearer to the site root. I get that, but I feel it is not needed. > This was partly motivated from it sometimes being annoying to just > check what forms an element can take and not finding it easy to see in > the manual. If org-syntax.org becomes stable enough in Worg, we can link to this page from the manual when necessary. Thanks! -- Bastien
